Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Wisner Classic Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 1, 1996No. 95 CV 1058 (ADS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge:
This lawsuit arises from the patent infringement claims of the plaintiff, Morris Hoffman (“Hoffman” or the “plaintiff’) against the defendant Wisner Classic Manufacturing Co., Inc. (“Wisner” or the “defendant”). Hoffman is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 4,602,860 (“the ’860 patent”) which apparently covers the components used in a certain type of camera. The gravamen of his Complaint is that Wisner has violated his rights by manufacturing cameras which infringe on the ’860 patent. Based on these allegations, on March 15, 1995, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Marchon Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Faggiano v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.