Legal Opinion
Faggiano v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 21, 2005No. 6:03-cr-06070PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action for retaliation brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Now before the Court is defendant’s motion (# 35) for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion (#47) for leave to file an amended complaint. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is granted, and plaintiffs cross-motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
On December 8, 1999, plaintiff Michael Faggiano (“Faggiano”) wrote a letter to defendant Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) detailing discriminatory conditions he alleged he…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Mazyck v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Lincoln v. PotterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Montague v. National Grid USADistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Nicole Gates v. New York City Human Resources AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.