Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MAUSKOPF, District Judge.
Defendant Entegris, Inc. objects to Magistrate Judge William D. Wall’s May 23, 2008 Order (the “May 23rd Order”) clarifying the terms and conditions of a September 15, 2006 protective order (the “Protective Order”) entered into between Entegris and Plaintiff Pall Corp. [Docket entry 135]. Pall has interposed its oppo sition to the objections and seeks additionally to strike portions of Entegris’ submissions as constituting an improper expansion of Entegris’ unpreserved arguments. Upon a review of the record, this Court concludes that, for the reasons…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Weiss v. La SuisseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. First Wireless Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Centocor, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ahmed v. T.J. Maxx Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Philips v. Iguzzini Lighting USA, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.