State v. O'MEARA
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
In this appeal from his convictions of pattern of harassing conduct, harassment, multiple violations of a harassment restraining order, and falsely reporting a crime, appellant challenges his convictions and sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Thomas O’Meara and R.O. were married in 1999. They separated in September 2003, and O’Meara moved out of the home they had shared. On March 1, 2006, R.O. obtained a harassment restraining order that prohibited O’Meara from harassing R.O. or having any contact with her, directly or indirectly. The order also required that O’Meara…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph BullheadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph GreeneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Stephanie JoNell GuscetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Steve VangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.