Legal Opinion
State v. Barajas
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 23, 2012No. A11-0983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of first-degree possession of methamphet*210amine with intent to sell. He argues that the district court committed reversible error by (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence seized by the police during an unlawful search of his cellular telephone, (2) admitting in evidence three photographs recovered from his cellular telephone that were irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial, and (3) admitting in evidence drug-courier-profile testimony. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 30, 2009, the landlord of a rental property in Moorhead reported a…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. EichersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Allan Carbo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Quentin Todd ChuteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kyle Dean McCLAIN, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.