Legal Opinion
State v. Hawkinson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 24, 2013No. Nos. A11-1565, A11-1819PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H, Justice.
The State charged David Gustave Haw-kinson with several misdemeanor offenses, including driving a motor vehicle with a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. Hawkinson pleaded not guilty and moved to suppress the results of his blood-alcohol test. The Hennepin County District Court granted Hawkinson’s motion to suppress the evidence and the State filed a pretrial appeal. In a published opinion, the Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s suppression order. State v. Hawkinson, 812 N.W.2d 201, 205 (Minn.App.2012). In essence, the court of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WeissingerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward LoveCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Ed CadwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Kevin RyanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Rashad Devon MickelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.