Cooley v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LINDA COOLEY, Case No.: 3:22-cv-1754-MMA-KSC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL [Doc. Nos. 33, 34] 14 C.R. BARD, INC. et al., DIRECTING FURTHER 15 SUBMISSIONS Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 The parties’ Joint Discovery Motion is presently before the Court. See Doc. No. 34 19 (the “Joint Motion”). The parties initially filed a version of the Joint Motion that omitted 20 the evidentiary exhibits relevant to resolving the issues before the Court. Doc. No. 33. The 21…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Oakes v. Halvorsen Marine Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- In Re California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.