Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Halvorsen Marine Ltd.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 2, 1998No. CV 97-3987-LGB(RCX)PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCEEDINGS: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES

CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

On March 2, 1998, defendants filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Answers to Interrogatories, with joint stipulation containing supporting exhibits and declarations of Gordon E. Gray III and Donald M. Adams, Jr. The motion came on regularly for hearing before Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman on April 2, 1998. The plaintiff was represented by Donald M. Adams, Jr., attorney at law, and defendants were represented by Gordon E. Gray III,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
  2. United States ex rel. O'Connell v. Chapman UniversityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  3. Moon v. SCP Pool Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
  4. A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  5. Lofton v. Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API