Legal Opinion

Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an Individual

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1975No. 73-3163PublishedCited by 567 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TRASK, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal in a private antitrust action brought in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking injunctive relief and damages. The plaintiff and appellant is Harold D. Blankenship, an independent contractor for the purchase, distribution and. sale of the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner newspaper. The defendants are the Hearst Corporation, publisher of the newspaper, and William H. Myers, Director of Circulation of the newspaper.

The first cause of action was brought and the jurisdiction of the court was invoked to recover…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by567 opinions

  1. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  2. Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  3. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Tracinda Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
  4. Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Pacific Coast Agricultural Export Ass'n v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

562 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API