Legal Opinion

Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2009No. S163335PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In this case we consider whether the trial court erred by directing a referee to conduct an in camera review of an opinion letter sent by outside counsel to a corporate client, allowing the referee to redact the letter to conceal that portion the referee believed to be privileged, and ordering the client to disclose the remainder to the opposing party. We conclude the court’s directions and order violated the attorney-client privilege, and violated as well the statutory prohibition against requiring disclosure of information claimed to be subject to the attorney-client…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Apple Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. L.A. Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors v. Superior Court of L.A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2016

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API