Legal Opinion
Friedlander v. HMS-PEP PRODUCTS, INC.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 9, 1997No. A97A0407PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Judge.
Mitchell K. Friedlander appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of HMS-PEP Products, Inc. (Pep), Gregory Thomas, and an unspecified number of John Doe defendants. Fried-lander’s suit alleged violations of the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, OCGA § 10-1-370 et seq., and the False Advertising Act, OCGA § 10-1-420 et seq. His primary contention is that the trial court erroneously found that he lacked standing to bring suit under either of these statutes.
Friedlander holds a patent for a weight loss drug product. With the exception of some tests which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Akron Pest Control v. Radar Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Hallisy v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Ehlers v. Schwall & HeuettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Friedlander v. PDK Labs, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
3Cited by11 opinions
- Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Catrett v. Landmark Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- City of Rome, Georgia v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Collins v. Athens Orthopedic ClinicCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Hughes v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.