Legal Opinion
Friedlander v. PDK Labs, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 22, 1996No. S95Q1740PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
Friedlander developed a patented diet control drug for which he is seeking approval from the Food and Drug Administration. PDK Labs, Inc. (PDK) markets its own diet control products and is, therefore, Friedlander’s competitor. In state court, Friedlander brought suit against PDK, alleging a violation of the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), OCGA § 10-1-390 et seq. According to the allegations of Friedlander’s complaint, PDK unfairly and deceptively markets its diet control products by failing to disclose that those products are untested and lack governmental…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zeeman v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- State v. Meredith Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Gross v. Ideal Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- State of Georgia v. Meredith ChevroletSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Mitchell K. Friedlander v. Pdk, Labs, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pdk Labs, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mitchell K. Friedlander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc. v. Longhorn Steaks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Pasternak & Fidis, P.C. v. Recall Total Information Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Honig v. COMCAST OF GEORGIA I, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Friedlander v. HMS-PEP PRODUCTS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.