Legal Opinion
Hughes v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided November 12, 2009No. Civil Action 2:08cv79KS-MTPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEITH STARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a Motion for Summary Judgment [# 79] filed on behalf of the defendant, Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”). The court, having reviewed the motion, the response, the briefs of counsel, the authorities cited, the pleadings and exhibits on file and being otherwise fully advised in the premises finds that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is well taken and should be granted. The court specifically finds as follows:
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS
Boston Scientific is the designer, manufacturer,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Hughes v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson & Cordis Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- McLaughlin v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.