Legal Opinion

Catrett v. Landmark Dodge, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 2002No. A01A2153PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

On June 19,1999, Craig Catrett purchased a 1999 Dodge Dakota truck from Landmark Dodge, Inc. (“Landmark”). Approximately 14 months later, Catrett sued Landmark for fraud, rescissión, and violation of the Fair Business Practices Act and the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, alleging that the dealership fraudulently induced him to purchase the truck by misrepresenting its condition. Landmark moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Catrett appeals, and for reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. GCA Strategic Investment Fund, Ltd. v. Joseph Charles & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Castellana v. Conyers Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Regency Nissan, Inc. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. PNR, Inc. v. Beacon Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  3. Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Johnson v. GAPVT Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Amin v. Mercedes-Benz United States, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API