Legal Opinion
Miller v. Bargain City, U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 16, 1964No. Civ. A. 33404PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.
This case is now before the court on defendants’ motions under Rule 12 to dismiss both counts of plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. § 78j) (The Act), 1 and Rule 10b-5 2 [adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to authority granted by Congress in 10(b) and 23 (a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 78j, 78w)]. Plaintiffs base Count I of their action “solely and exclusively” upon Sections 10 (b) and 27 3 of the Act.
Count II is against seven of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ralph Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1966
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., a Texas Corporation, Charles F. Fogarty, Richard D. Mollison, Walter Holyk, Kenneth H. Darke, Francis G. Coates, Claude O. Stephens, John A. Murray, Earl L. Huntington, and Harold B. Kline, Defendants- Securities and Exchange Commission v. David M. Crawford and Richard H. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Fischer v. KletzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.