Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Kletz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 5, 1967No. 65 Civ. 787PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TYLER, District Judge.
In October, 1966, plaintiffs in this class action 1 moved against defendant Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (“PMM”) for further discovery under Rule 34, F.R. Civ.P., based in part upon the allegations set forth in paragraphs 25 through 25.3 of the second consolidated amended complaint (hereinafter “the complaint”). PMM opposed this motion, and, in addition, cross-moved against the plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1) and/or 12(b) (6), F.R.Civ.P., for an order by this court dismissing paragraphs 25-25.3 of the complaint on the grounds that the court has no…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Walter J. Kohler v. Kohler Co., a Corporation, Herbert v. Kohler, Ernst & Ernst, a Partnership, and Paul F. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Fischer v. KletzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1966
- Pettit v. American Stock ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.