Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1971No. Nos. 280-70 to 285-70PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellees and cross-appellants Reynolds, Mitchell and Stout instituted actions in the Utah district against appellants and cross-appellees Texas Gulf Sulphur Company (hereinafter referred to as TGS) and Charles A. Fogarty, one of the principal officers of the company, to recover damages for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder. The actions were consolidated for trial to the court without a jury and plaintiffs procured judgments in the three eases.1
While the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- R. Richard Bastian, III v. Petren Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,473 Maurice Shapiro v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Arnold B. ELKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. LIGGETT & MYERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- In Re Warner Communications Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.