Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1971No. Crim. 4339PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GARDNER, P. J.

After a jury trial, defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of Penal Code, section 273a and section 273d (child beating).

The defendant’s first contention is that the court committed prejudicial error in allowing the testimony of a doctor concerning the “battered child syndrome.” An obvious answer to this contention is that no objection was made to this testimony. However, since it appears that under present procedures, appellate review is endless and if we dispose of the matter on that basis, we can realistically anticipate a collateral attack in which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LavergneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Travelers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Estate of RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. People v. VisciottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API