Legal Opinion

Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Durham Realty, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 26, 1994No. 11863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

This is an appeal by the foreclosing plaintiff, Farmers and Mechanics Savings Bank, from the denial of its motion for a deficiency judgment. The plaintiff claims that the trial court was required to determine the market value of the subject property and to find a resulting deficiency where there was no evidence of a value in excess of the debt and the undisputed evidence showed a value far less than the debt. The defendants deny that there was such undisputed evidence and claim that General Statutes § 49-14 does not place an affirmative duty on the trial court to determine the fair market…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Eichman v. J & J Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Latimer v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. City Sav. Bk of Bridgeport v. MikoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. Di Diego v. ZarroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. VollConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Suna Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Lestorti v. DeLeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. CTB Ventures 55, Inc. v. RubensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. American Mortgage Corp. v. HopeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API