Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Durham Realty, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
This is an appeal by the foreclosing plaintiff, Farmers and Mechanics Savings Bank, from the denial of its motion for a deficiency judgment. The plaintiff claims that the trial court was required to determine the market value of the subject property and to find a resulting deficiency where there was no evidence of a value in excess of the debt and the undisputed evidence showed a value far less than the debt. The defendants deny that there was such undisputed evidence and claim that General Statutes § 49-14 does not place an affirmative duty on the trial court to determine the fair market…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Eichman v. J & J Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Latimer v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- City Sav. Bk of Bridgeport v. MikoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Di Diego v. ZarroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. VollConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Suna Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Lestorti v. DeLeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- CTB Ventures 55, Inc. v. RubensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- American Mortgage Corp. v. HopeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.