Federal Deposit Insurance v. Voll
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This appeal is taken by Zoltán Gutt-man, one of the defendants1 in a foreclosure action, from a deficiency judgment rendered against him.
Guttman raises two claims. First, he claims that General Statutes § 49-14,2 Connecticut’s deficiency judg*200ment statute, violates his state constitutional right to trial by jury by limiting the determination of damages to a court hearing. Second, he claims that the trial court improperly concluded that the plaintiff mortgagee acted reasonably despite an allegedly considerable delay in proceeding to judgment. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Certain…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Eichman v. J & J Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Giordano v. GiordanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Benvenuto v. MahajanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Connecticut National Bank v. L & R RealtyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.