Legal Opinion

State v. Clay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 2010No. C062810CR; A136583PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant, who was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, appeals. He assigns error to, inter alia, the trial court’s admission, over defendant’s objection, of a pediatric nurse practitioner’s expert diagnosis that the complainant had been sexually abused. That diagnosis was rendered “in the absence of any physical evidence of abuse.” State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 142, 218 P3d 104 (2009). As explained below, we conclude, consistently with the analyses of State v. Lovern, 234 Or App 502, 228 P3d 688 (2010), and State v. Merrimon, 234 Or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. Volynets-VasylchenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Department of Human Services v. L. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. FellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API