State v. Feller
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, one count of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.411, and six counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. He contends that, in the absence of supporting physical evidence, the trial court erred in admitting a physician’s diagnosis of “concerning” for sexual abuse. See State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 218 P3d 104 (2009). Although defendant acknowledges that he did not raise that issue before the trial court, he argues that admission of that diagnosis was plain error under Southard.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- B. A. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. CodonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. PekarekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. Murillo-BejarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.