State v. Grier
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
By his assignments of error, defendant presents three questions for review: (1) whether in-court identification of defendant was tainted by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification procedure; (2) whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill; and (3) whether the trial court erred in failing to find as a mitigating factor that at the time of the offense, defendant suffered from a drug problem that was insufficient to constitute a defense but significantly reduced his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. JewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. BushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.