Legal Opinion

State v. Grier

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 1984No. 8326SC584PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

By his assignments of error, defendant presents three questions for review: (1) whether in-court identification of defendant was tainted by an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification procedure; (2) whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill; and (3) whether the trial court erred in failing to find as a mitigating factor that at the time of the offense, defendant suffered from a drug problem that was insufficient to constitute a defense but significantly reduced his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. JewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. BushCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API