Legal Opinion

North Carolina National Bank v. Burnette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 12, 1979No. 28PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The trial court entered judgment for plaintiff notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) on the ground that plaintiff, as a matter of law, had substantially complied with the procedures provided by G.S. 25-9-601, et seq. (Cum. Supp. 1977), for the disposition of collateral by public sale and therefore the public sale of the grading equipment was conclusively deemed “to be commercially reasonable in all aspects.” G.S. 25-9-601. The first question presented by this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing JNOV for plaintiff on the issue of commercial reasonableness of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Phillips v. Youth Development Program, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API