Legal Opinion
Kraus v. Newton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1989No. 13444PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
This case is an appeal from the decision of the Appellate Court in Kraus v. Newton, 14 Conn. App. 561, 542 A.2d 1163, cert. granted, 208 Conn. 815, 546 A.2d 282 (1988). We granted certification to review the judgment of the Appellate Court limited to two issues: (1) whether the trial court’s failure to allow a statement by the defendant to be marked as an exhibit for identification was harmless error, and (2) whether there was error in the jury charge regarding the defendant’s duty of care.
The underlying facts were set forth in Kraus v. Newton, supra, and we summarize those pertinent to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. AnnunziatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. SilvaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Papadopoulos v. Target CorporationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Lori A. Henderson v. Reid Hospital and Healthcare ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Benaski v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Esaw v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.