Legal Opinion

Amert v. Ziebarth Construction Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1987No. 15299PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Appellant appeals trial court’s judgment denying prejudgment interest. We reverse and remand.

Appellant, Henry Amert (Amert), is the owner of a recreation building in Madison, South Dakota and was a stockholder in Amert Construction Company. Amert Construction Company was the prime contractor on the recreation building. Insulation work on the building was subcontracted to the Ziebarth Construction Company, doing business as Madison Insulation. The insulation was supplied by U.S. Fiber Corporation.

The recreation building, built in conjunction with a twenty-four unit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Arcon Construction Co. v. South Dakota Cement PlantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Beka v. Lithium Corporation of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Chesapeake Industries, Inc. v. Togova Entreprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Polster, Inc. v. SwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. South Dakota Building Authority v. Geiger-Berger Associates, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. First Dakota National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. First Dakota National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. Heer v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API