Chesapeake Industries, Inc. v. Togova Entreprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Introduction
This appeal arises from an action for an accounting under a lease agreement in which the lessor was awarded prejudgment interest under Civil Code section 3287. We conclude the amount of damages owed was not sufficiently certain or calculable and thus prejudgment interest was not appropriate.
I. Statement of Fact and Proceedings Below
Appellant Chesapeake Industries, Inc. (Chesapeake) leased real property from respondent Togova Enterprises, Inc. (Togova) by written lease agreement dated September 28, 1967. The term of the lease was ten years beginning November 1,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lee Investment LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Schwartz v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Thompson v. AsimosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Cassinos v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.