Legal Opinion
Polster, Inc. v. Swing
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1985No. B004809PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DANIELSON, J.
Defendants, Carol and Ronald Swing and Carol’s Interiors, Inc. (Carol’s Interiors or lessee), interior designers, appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Polster, Inc. (Polster or lessor) for damages and an award of prejudgment interest, for defendants’ failure to return leased property to plaintiff in the same condition as received. We affirm the judgment in part and reverse it in part.
Facts
On February 5, 1974, Polster and Carol’s Interiors entered into a written lease of a store located in Sherman Oaks, California for the term of five years. Carol’s Interiors was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Esgro Central, Inc. v. General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Chesapeake Industries, Inc. v. Togova Entreprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Appleton v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Schwartz v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sequoia InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- James B. Lansing Sound, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.