Legal Opinion

Heer v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1988No. 15791, 15795PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs Leonard Heer, Wilma Heer, and Flynn Heer (Plaintiffs) filed a com*560plaint in the circuit court for Hutchinson County seeking compensation from the State of South Dakota (State)1 for flood damage to their personal and real property, lost profits on drowned hogs, and crop losses allegedly caused by the State’s negligence in maintaining the Menno Dam. The dam failed and collapsed on June 12, 1984. On the day of trial, the State admitted liability. A jury trial was then held regarding damages. The jury awarded $590,523 to Plaintiffs in damages, but…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Miller v. StevensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dartt v. BerghorstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Frey v. KoufSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API