Legal Opinion

South Dakota Building Authority v. Geiger-Berger Associates, P.C.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1987No. 15141, 15158, 15162, 15173, 15175, 15178PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TICE, Circuit Judge.

JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT

Appellant, South Dakota Building Authority, appeals from an order denying prejudgment interest. Appellee Fritzel, Kroe-ger, Griffin and Berg filed a notice of review appealing the trial court’s refusal to grant judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of indemnity and on the grounds of estoppel. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1972, the University of South Dakota began the creation of a new physical education facility ultimately known as the Dakota Dome (Dome). The South Dakota Building Authority (Authority) is the legal owner of the Dome. Authority…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lien v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Jones v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc. v. WookeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kusser v. FellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Fanning v. IversenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API