Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gulf Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1940No. 34,832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This action was brought to recover permanent damages to a farm in Sumner county. The damage was alleged to have resulted from pollution of a creek due to the failure of defendants to confine salt water, oil and oil refuse from the Williams No. 1 well, located on the oil and gas lease. The action was brought by Dora I. Williams and her children, owners of the land. It appears the lease was executed to the defendant, the Gypsy Oil Company, and that the defendant, the Gulf Oil Company, later purchased the lease together with all other property…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fair v. Golden Rule Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Helms v. Eastern Kansas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Donley v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. AderholdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Cities Service Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Rusch v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Reiserer v. MurfinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Rudy Davis v. Cities Service Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API