Legal Opinion

Donley v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1940No. 34,781PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action to recover temporary damages to a stock farm alleged to have been caused by the pollution of a creek *519which intersected the pasture land. Judgment was for plaintiffs, and defendants, Amerada Petroleum Corporation, and the Shell Petroleum Corporation, have appealed.

Damages were sought and recovered for decreased annual rental value of the farm for a period of two years, October 18, 1935, to October 18, 1937. In addition to recovery of actual damages in the sum of $759, a verdict was returned and judgment rendered in the sum…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. DureinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Sternbock v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Berry v. Shell Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Berwind White Coal Mining Co. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Hammargren v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Atkinson v. Herington Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Rusch v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API