Legal Opinion

Helms v. Eastern Kansas Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1917No. 21,332PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action was brought by S. F. Helms against the Eastern Kansas Oil Company, Limited, to recover damages alleged to have been caused through the operation of defendant’s oil refinery, which is situated near the corner of plaintiff’s farm, which he has occupied as a homestead for many years. A small natural watercourse flows through the refinery grounds and across the north half of plaintiff’s farm. On May 1, 1914, the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant, claiming damages because of the oil, poisonous substances and fumes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Stotler v. RochelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Gilmore v. Royal Salt Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Fogarty v. Junction City Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Phillips v. Lawrence Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Williams v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland MeadowsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Tidewater Oil Company v. George E. Jackson and Karl B. Jackson, Doing Business in Partnership as Jackson BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Northern Natural Gas Company v. L.D. Drilling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API