Reiserer v. Murfin
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Robb, J.:
Plaintiff, appellee, filed this action against defendants to recover damages by reason of defendants having permitted substances to escape from their oil lease operations which substances entered the subsurface strata and fresh-water veins underlying plaintiff’s land and the same were thereby polluted. A motion to make definite and certain was sustained in part and overruled in part by the trial court, and plaintiff thereafter filed a supplemental petition. Defendants’ demurrer to the petition and supplemental petition was overruled by order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donley v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Lofland v. CromanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Franks v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Rusch v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Emrie v. TiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958