Legal Opinion

Reiserer v. Murfin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1958No. 41,060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

Plaintiff, appellee, filed this action against defendants to recover damages by reason of defendants having permitted substances to escape from their oil lease operations which substances entered the subsurface strata and fresh-water veins underlying plaintiff’s land and the same were thereby polluted. A motion to make definite and certain was sustained in part and overruled in part by the trial court, and plaintiff thereafter filed a supplemental petition. Defendants’ demurrer to the petition and supplemental petition was overruled by order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donley v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Lofland v. CromanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Franks v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Rusch v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Emrie v. TiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API