Legal Opinion

Rusch v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 3, 1947No. 36,612PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.

This was an action by a tenant to recover damages resulting from the alleged deprivation of the use of leased land and other damages resulting from the pollution of water.

The defendant corporations were: Phillips Petroleum Company, Cities Service Oil Company, Gulf Oil Corporation and Phil-Han Oil Company. These defendants will be referred to as the parties have designated them, to wit: “Phillips,” “Gulf,” “Cities Service” and “Phil-Han.” We are advised the following individual defendants were owners of an interest in the Phil-Han lease: G. W.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ShortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Meneley v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Donley v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. State v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  2. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Claude v. Weaver Construction CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API