Legal Opinion

St. John Urban Development Corp. v. Chisholm

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 16, 2008No. AC 29202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The plaintiff, St. John Urban Development Corporation, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Mabel Chisholm, in this summary process action. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that the plaintiff could not evict the defendant because it had proven that the defendant had materially breached the lease. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiff pursued this summary process action in two counts: (1) under count one, nonpayment of rent; and (2) under count three, 1 violation of the lease by failing to maintain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. GuimaraesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Thompson v. OrcuttConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Utzler v. BracaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Twin Oaks Condominium Ass'n v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API