Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Carpenter

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1930No. 5442PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNAUGHTON, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, respondent here, to recover for damages to his automobile resulting from a collision with the car of defendant. This occurred on the Meridian-Nampa Highway, three miles west of Boise, at or near an intersecting road which crosses it. The action is for alleged negligence. The defense is a denial of negligence on the part of appellant and a claim that respondent was guilty of contributory negligence which precludes recovery.

At the time of the collision respondent’s car was proceeding east toward Boise, and appellant’s car had just come upon the main…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. McPhee v. LavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Carpenter ex rel. Carpenter v. Campbell Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Brixey v. CraigIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bragdon v. KelloggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. EwingIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Dewey v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Petersen v. ParryIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. McCoy v. KrengelIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dawson v. Salt Lake Hardware Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API