Legal Opinion

Brixey v. Craig

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1930No. 5395PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNAUGHTON, J.-

Plaintiffs, Ruth Helen Brixey and E. Brixey, instituted separate actions in damages against defendant to recover for personal injuries and damage to property alleged as resulting from an automobile collision due to defendant’s negligence. Defendant denies negligence and pleads contributory negligence. The cases were consolidated by the trial judge. A verdict was returned in favor of each plaintiff, assessing Ruth Helen Brixey’s damages at $900, and E. Brixey’s damages at $450, together with a verdict for $90 for damage to plaintiffs’ car. Judgment was entered accordingly, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayden v. LundgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lundy v. HazenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Meade v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bale v. PerrymanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ineas v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API