Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Ewing

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1949No. Nos. 7437, 7438PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLENNON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, John H. Baldwin, by his guardian, Matthew Baldwin, filed an action against the defendant, Frank C. Ewing, to recover general damages for injuries suffered by him as a result of a collision of a truck driven by defendant, with an automobile driven by plaintiff upon a certain road near Emmett, Idaho.

The plaintiff, Matthew Baldwin, father of John H. Baldwin, in a separate suit claimed special damages on account of the same collision and resulting injuries to his son, covering necessary items of expenditure for hospitalization, physician’s services, drugs…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stearns Ex Rel. Stearns v. GravesIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Poston v. HollarIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Allan v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Bennett v. DeatonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Riggs v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Page v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Rosenberg v. ToetlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API