Legal Opinion
United States v. Brantner
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided December 12, 2000No. CGCMG 0142; Docket No. 1103PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McClelland, judge:
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of 12 specifications of violating a lawful general order by using a government computer to download sexually explicit images from the Internet in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 892, and 8 specifications of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) by knowingly receiving child pornography in interstate commerce in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HogsettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. LabeanU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. ColemanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. HalseyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
- United States v. MontesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. HalseyU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.