Legal Opinion

United States v. Montes

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 19, 2004No. CGCMS 24263; Docket No. 1202PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClelland, judge:

Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of nineteen specifications of violating a general order by using Coast Guard office equipment to view sexually explicit material, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 892. The military judge sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-3. The Convening Authority approved the sentence, which was not affected by the pretrial agreement.

Before this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HalseyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  2. United States v. HalseyU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API