Legal Opinion
Eddleman v. United States
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 29, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 8195PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs herein, partners doing business as Eddleman Brothers, brought this action seeking to set aside and enjoin the enforcement of orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, which orders denied their application for authority to operate as a contract carrier by motor vehicle.
The plaintiffs’ application, filed March 26, 1962, and amended April 16, 1962, seeks the issuance of a permit to operate in interstate commerce over irregular routes, carrying meat, meat by-products, and articles distributed by packing houses between Denver, Adams, Jefferson, Weld, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lang Transp. Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
- Port Terminal Railroad Association v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Midwest Truck Lines, Ltd. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967