Legal Opinion
United States v. Denny
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 24, 2012No. 11-2029PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Travis Denny, a federal inmate, seeks a certifícate of appealability (COA) to allow him to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (COA required to appeal dismissal of § 2255 motion). The court ruled that his motion was time-barred under the one-year limitations period of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). See id. § 2255(f). Most of Defendant’s challenges to that ruling are routine, but he raises a novel claim based on the AEDPA provision that delays the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marsh v. SoaresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Price v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Hall v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Abernathy v. WandesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Hale v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- United States v. PullenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.