Legal Opinion

Hale v. Fox

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2016No. 14-1294PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHESON, Circuit Judge.

Matthew Hale was convicted of obstruction of justice and soliciting the murder of a federal judge. After filing an unsuccessful motion for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, he filed a habeas corpus application under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking relief on two grounds. First, he claimed that, because the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish guilt under the solicitation and obstruction statutes, he was “actually innocent.” Second, he claimed that possible juror misconduct, which he learned about after his § 2255 motion had been denied, may have deprived…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Desmond Rouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Sandlain v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Jones v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. MobarekehCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. ARANDA v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API