Legal Opinion
Price v. Philpot
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2005No. 04-7121PublishedCited by 328 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Daniel Joe Price (“Plaintiff’ or “Price”) brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his constitutional rights by several state and local law enforcement officers (collectively “Defendants”). The district court dismissed all of Price’s claims after applying Oklahoma’s two-year statute of limitations, Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), and the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act (“OGT- CA”), Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 153(B) (2000). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We AFFIRM…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dunn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by328 opinions
- Gee v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Trujillo v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Bryson v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Douglas v. NoelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Sontay SmothermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
323 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.