Legal Opinion

United States v. Pullen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 29, 2019No. 17-3194PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

The district court sentenced Bobby G. Pullen as a career offender pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual ("USSG") § 4B1.1 at a time when the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory. In 2015, the Supreme Court decided Johnson v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2551 , 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), holding the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(2)(B)(ii) is unconstitutionally vague. As the residual clause of § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) is identical in wording to the residual clause of USSG § 4B1.2 (a definitional provision for USSG § 4B1.1 ), Mr. Pullen, relying…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Todd D'Antoni v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Bobbie London, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Brian CarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API