Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peden v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2004No. Docket 119408Published

1DissentKelly, J.

While I agree with much of the majority’s analysis, I cannot join in its decision to uphold the trial court’s summary dismissal of this case. Instead, I would affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, reverse the trial court’s ruling, and remand the matter for trial.

The issue is not whether defendant has the right to require all its officers to meet what it determines are essential functions of police work within the department. It is whether plaintiff presented a factual question about whether the requirements that defendant has designated as essential for its police officers are actually…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Champ v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
  5. Shoemaker v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API