Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 24, 1993No. 1042 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
John E. Shoemaker petitions for review the order of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (PHRC) dismissing his complaint against the City of Lock Haven Police Department (City) finding that he had failed to prove that his discharge was discriminatory.
Since 1968, Shoemaker was employed by the City as a police officer and had reached the rank of detective. The City police department consists of only 12 or 13 officers. On November 16, 1982, Shoemaker suffered symptoms of angina at work. He was diagnosed with Varían Prinzmetal’s Angina of the coronary artery by his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hussey v. May Department Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Magel v. Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Lincoln Realty Management Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ensslin v. Township of North BergenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Hoover v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1996
- Peden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Peden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2004