Legal Opinion
Hoeft v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 15, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2016-0171Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CYNTHIA HOEFT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-0171 (TFH) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Cynthia Hoeft filed this lawsuit against the United States of America after a motorist struck and injured her while she was riding her bicycle across a crosswalk in the District of Columbia during rush hour. The plaintiff contends that the collision occurred because the United States—namely the National Park Service—negligently failed to place adequate signs along the roadway warning motorists about the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.