Ayyildiz v. Kidd
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff (Ayyildiz), a licensed physician, was sued unsuccessfully for malpractice by Grubb, one of his patients. The plaintiff then filed a motion for judgment against Grubb’s counsel, Edward S. Kidd, Jr., a licensed attorney.
Count I of this motion, as amended, alleged that Kidd prosecuted the unsuccessful malpractice action without probable cause and with malice. Essentially, this is a “malicious prosecution” action against the attorney or, as the term is sometimes used, “wrongful use of civil proceedings.” For convenience the term “malicious prosecution” will be used in this opinion.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Schwartz v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Bickel v. MacKieDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1978
- Lee v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- Wetmore v. MellingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Donohoe Construction Co. v. Mount Vernon AssociatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Bryant Electric Company, Inc. v. City of Fredericksburg and Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Lewis v. KeiSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
- Allen v. LindstromSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.